That is exactly why Morandi was such a great painter. There isn't a single wasted motion, every brushstroke counted for something. Man, what he did with edges is a lesson. He neutralized subject by using the same mundane still life over and over—that array of jars and bottles and vases—but while the subject didn't change, each painting was a whole new adventure in seeing. Everything's brought out, everything understood.This, of course, got me curious about Morandi, and . . . sure enough: still lifes—the same old jars and bottles and vases, over and over again. I guess this might count as obsessive art. But it's also beautiful—even just here on my computer screen. Now I long to go see an exhibition of Morandi's work in person. Because as Irwin also remarks, in reproduction, you only get a vague idea of the edges; it's in the painting itself that the edges come alive.
And the point is that that's finally what a painting is. I mean, the subjects and all that are fine, but finally, a painting is a painting. And if you don't know something about painting, if you don't understanding something about the tools you're using and know how to make them work for you, and I mean really work for you, well then, they'll all work against you.
So, here are a few of his still lifes. Intimate, sensuous, careful exercises in seeing. (Click on the images to see large on black.)
No comments:
Post a Comment