The class was fun. I found that I in fact do have a penchant for stickling little details, plus I'm pretty good at gauging how much interference a particular author needs. Or put another way, I had my own standard that my authors needed to rise to—but that's something I only found out over time, sometimes to my detriment. (Editing can be very time consuming, and that time is not necessarily always a good investment.) In any case, I did well in the class, and Marilyn pulled me aside at the end and suggested I take the Press's proofreading test. In those days, proofreading meant comparison proofreading: you'd get the typeset pages and the marked-up manuscript and make sure all the editing had been correctly transcribed by the typesetter. By working with the edited pages, I would learn more deeply how to approach an editing project.
So I did take the test, passed it, and I started proofreading. Pretty quickly, I was given my first editing job, which was sort of a hybrid beast, halfway between proofreading and actual editing: a revision of Don Gifford's Notes for Joyce: An Annotation of James Joyce's Ulysses, previously published by Dutton in 1974 (and now to be called Ulysses Annotated: Notes for James Joyce's Ulysses.) The manuscript consisted of carefully pasted snippets from the earlier edition, interspersed with new typewritten notes. The job involved teeny-tiny writing (I'm good at that too), and because it was a reference work, the quality of the prose wasn't an issue—though as I recall, Gifford's prose was just fine.
From those humble beginnings, I went on to edit, oh, hundreds of books. I used to receive them in the mail, months after I'd finished them, and for years I kept them. But eventually I realized they were only taking up valuable shelf space, so I jettisoned most of them (a used bookstore in Santa Cruz catering to the university crowd took them). But first I carefully sliced the dust covers (those that had them) and, if I was mentioned in the acknowledgments, the title and acknowledgments pages. Much less bulky. Eventually, I realized that I didn't care about even those clippings very much. And so, a couple of years ago, I used some of them to make a little book arts project: a flag book. (It's nice to know all that hard work was good for something!) The rest I burned in the fireplace. Yes I did.
And just today, a new job has arrived on my computer, editing being all done on-line now. I always feel a little more "honest" when I have a job in. Like I'm part of a well-oiled machine. This one is about a minimalist sculptor named Anne Truitt. I expect I'll learn something. I usually do.
2 comments:
Enjoyed reading this. Interesting what we no longer care about after all these years...
Reading is like a conversation with you. At times I hear the "mmmmmm" and the "oh, I know". Truths be told. The pattern follows here philosophical to the everyday, "I always feel a little more "honest" when I have a job in. Like I'm part of a well-oiled machine. This one is about a minimalist sculptor named Anne Truitt. I expect I'll learn something. I usually do."
Post a Comment